Week in Review: May 21st – 27th, 2018

Who We Are and How We Got Here – This will be one of my favorite books I’ll read this year. David Reich’s Who We Are and How We Got Here details the still nascent field of ancient DNA analysis, how it is upending the existing scientific hierarchy, and how ancient DNA is retelling the story of human evolution on planet Earth. Before this period, we had to rely on anthropology, archeology, philology, and older science, like carbon dating, to triangulate knowledge about human prehistory. Now, thanks to cheaper DNA sequencing technology and new methods of comparative analysis, scientists can gather a bone segment from central Eurasia and quickly know, with near absolute precision, which historic population of humans that sample is from, where that population came from and which populations were near them. The major revelations are twofold; first, pre-historic human populations have been moving around the globe almost continuously since the hypothetical (now in question!) “Out of Africa” theory; and second, these human populations have been mixing with each other for just as long. The implications here are massive. For example, you will learn repeatedly that Earth’s current racial demography is a relatively recent state of affairs and there have been numerous races before. The book details only 30 known human population mixture events, of which there are more still yet to be discovered; these events represent mixtures of populations more genetically disparate than modern Europeans are to modern Asians. There is a steep learning curve to this book, but Reich makes the cutting edge technology understandable for a layperson (read: me) while layering in a moral optimism to the findings. One cannot come away from this information without a profound sense of connection to our species’ shared history.

The Nasher Sculpture Center – A few unsurprising thematic clusters of permanent collection classics comprised the main exhibit on this visit, but the experience was still rich due to Renzo Piano’s wonderful design for the building. His penchant for overhead natural light in gallery spaces is still underrated, and the building’s comb-like structure up’s that ante with glass walls on north and south ends. The joys of that building were then tempered by the sculpture garden which I found a bit generic now that we live in an age where every modern art museum does more or less the same thing here.

The Crow Collection – Only the ground floor was available, but even with one floor and only two micro-exhibits, The Crow Collection is a gem for the city of Dallas. The first exhibit detailed a full set of Japanese samurai armor piece by piece. The armor was arranged on a mannequin in the center of the room allowing for a 360 degree analysis of the many pieces and ornaments. The second exhibit was a brief survey on the history of Korean ceramics. . . which was pretty fantastic luck because Korean ceramics happen to be my favorite ceramics in nearly every way: their colors, their glazes, and most of all, their shapes. The works were arranged by time period and paired with contemporary Korean ceramics for some interesting contrasts. I am always astounded by how distinct, elegant and sophisticated these works are from this tiny peninsula. My suspicion is that the extreme pressures of being sandwiched between the massive, ubiquitous cultures from China and Japan made such creativity possible and necessary.

Week in Review: May 14th – 20th, 2018

Claire’s Camera – Even Hong Sang-soo’s experiemental, slapdash editing ruse is more interesting and more fun than most film efforts, a testament to his talent. Here he’s gathered regular Kim Min-hee and French titan Isabelle Huppert to make a low stakes, 70 minute love triangle drama, shot on the streets of Cannes while the three of them were attending the eponymous film festival a few years ago. The film is a sort of artist’s statement (though its difficult to know when Hong is sincere. . .) about Hong’s approach to editing and the act of capturing someone on camera. Claire (Huppert) takes Polaroid pictures of characters throughout claiming that when you take a photo of someone, the person is changed. To look at that photo is to look at the distance between what you have changed into and what you were. Thus, filmmaking is the act of capturing change. Making all of this more complicated is the non-linear editing. Frequently the film jumps backwards and forwards in time, testing the viewer to not only compile the timeline but to focus on how the characters are imperceptibly changing.

Racer and the Jailbird – Belgium director Michaël R. Roskam newest, starring the beautiful Adèle Exarchopoulos and the beautiful Matthias Schoenaerts. I haven’t seen Roskam’s much lauded Bullhead and this film doesn’t whet the appetite. To start, Racer features a bizarre narrative with no less than three jarring plot shifts that actually change what the film is about. Most viewers having seen the first 30 minutes will not be expecting this film to have more to say about terminal illness and reform-based justice systems than bank robbing or racecar driving. Even more confusing, the movie was marketed as a sexy, Euro-crime thriller. At the very least its a surprising ride featuring two genuine francophone stars in their prime, I’m just skeptical that there is much of anything going on under the hood; a strange injection of Americana, sentimentality and Christianity in the final moments left me scratching my head.

The Bitter Tears of Petra von Kant – I saw this Cuban production at the Kennedy Center in Spanish with a very poor translation. Thus, any nuance this performance contained was lost on me. It did make me want to see the Rainer Werner Fassbender film on which it is based. The story is about a lesbian love triangle in West Germany and focuses on the changing power dynamics in a liberalizing Europe. This rendition maintains the location and time period of the film, but utilizes 4 male actors in drag for the lead roles. For an informed review from someone who did not need the subtitles I recommend this: PLACEHOLDER.

My Next Guest Needs No Introduction – Tina Fey is an important and hilarious comic, and this interview is an excellent introductory biography of her. She seems to be truly struggling with how to navigate our ever more politically correct world and the toxic culture of social media. I will talk about this a bit below, but I would like to see her stay away from SNL.

John Mulaney: Kid Gorgeous at Radio City – As a fan of John Mulaney, I was happy to see him provide a mostly entertaining special that, if venue size is any indication, epitomizes his well-earned popularity. I was also surprised by the size of his ambition, as this special is a claim to the comedy throne left vacant by #MeToo. But in lieu of this, I was left a bit sad. When comics go bigger, its inevitable that they will also have to be broader. This is a pop culture law of physics. In this special, Mulaney is louder, nastier, more machismo than normal, and though these are necessary land grabs for a broader comedy identity, I found I was laughing much less. Mulaney in conversations, interviews, working behind the scenes, and in smaller productions is weirder, brainier and riskier, traits that have gotten him this far. I hope he finds ways to maintain those characteristics as his star continues to rise.

Saturday Night Live – I was so high off of the Sterling K. Brown episode that I ended up watching the rest of this season. I would liken it to watching a clown car drive up off a ramp placed at the edge of a cliff and then continuing to watch as the clowns plunge into gorge, exploding on impact. That is to say, it started funny, and then quickly became very not funny and sort of painful. Witnessing Tina Fey host this finale was the final gut punch. She’s so talented and the years where she was head writer on SNL are some of the very best in the show’s history. Unfortunately, the skits they wrote for her were either overly reliant on that legacy, presenting old favorites devoid of their necessary cultural context, or dead on arrival political commentaries that have typified this season. My advice for Tina, follow the wise Kylo Ren’s advice and, “let the past die. Kill it, if you have to. That’s the only way to become what you were meant to be.”

Tully – Jason Reitman, Diablo Cody, and Charlize Theron have teamed up again for possibly their weirdest film yet. I was excited for this one, as Young Adult, their previous collaboration is probably Reitman’s best film. Tully is an om to the maternal experience and a fairly interesting indictment of new age lifestyles. I don’t think this movie works in the end, nor have I thought much about it since, but I enjoyed myself thoroughly despite its flaws. Cody is just a fun writer (I recommend seeing Jennifer’s Body for her finest work) and Theron can make any material compelling.

Michael Che Matters – Surprisingly funny. More people should be talking about this. Che is actually offensive in this special and seems sincere about it, repeatedly building a tension with his audience that his jokes then release. The fun is seeing how long he can sustain the awkwardness before he lets the audience off the hook. It goes without saying, but this guy is going places.