Week in Review: April 9th – April 15th, 2018

The New Yorker

Gemini – Aaron Katz’s glitzy new mumble-noir. As the title would suggest, this film is about twins, and I would contend that it is about two interrelated sets of twin relationships. The first pair is that of movie star Heather (Zoey Kravitz) and her personal assistant Jill (Lola Kirke). After setting up this pair’s intimate friendship, Heather is ~spoilers~ murdered, shot dead by the same gun that Jill had leant her the night before. As the prime suspect, Jill must evade the LAPD and the stylish, loquacious detective on the case (John Cho), as she scours the city for clues to solve her friend’s murder. The second Gemini relationship is that of Los Angeles and the film noir genre. On this front, Gemini does not fair well in a direct comparison with any auteur-directed, LA-set neo-noir made this century; Mulholland Dr., Brick, Drive, and Inherent Vice pretty much run the gambit and each of those are certainly more, well, let’s say narratively consequential. Which is not to say that this film doesn’t carve out its own space. The film’s strength lies in the writing, all by Katz, which resembles a fusion of delectable noir-isms and twentysomething speak – hashtags, slang, apps, etc.

Jealousy – Philippe Garrel’s 2013 effort La jalousie is his first entry in a recent trilogy on love. Starring his son Louis, the film elliptically picks at a series of frayed relationship’s detailing the role that jealousy plays in motivating relationship, parenting and career decisions. The choice to shoot on film in sumptuous black & white is effective in delineating these character motives and in targeting a particular male obliviousness. I’m unfamiliar with Garrel’s other work so I’m at a loss for context, but this picture felt a lot like watching a Éric Rohmer film from the 1960’s only without the humor or playfulness. I prefer the Rohmer.

Isle of Dogs

The Caucasian Chalk Circle – Bertolt Brecht’s modernist epic play within a play was entirely new to me. Beginning in a post-WWII Soviet Union town, a group of townspeople debate how to rebuild their economy with a local administrator. Reaching an impasse, the group suggests they put on a play that they’ve been working on to clarify their current concerns. This new play, set in medieval times, tells the tale of a royal baby, abandoned by its mother during a bloody regime change. The baby is found by a young woman named Grusha, who listens to her conscience and risks her life to rescue the child. The majority of the plot follows Grusha on the run, struggling to find conditions suitable to raise the child, culminating in a trial to determine the child’s proper home. Despite the fairy tale ending, I think the play is about how in times of great upheaval society’s only way to deal with the moral and ethical dilemmas of the present is to seek refuge in a past that tends to be inadequate, rendered obsolete by the very forces causing the upheaval. That things work out here for the people who do the right thing is tongue-in-cheek, a fantasy that Brecht forces the audience to retreat out of into a reality that inevitably proves harsher. This production all-around was scrappy and inventive, spearheaded by three terrific performances. The electric guitar led, synth-backed folk song sequences (did I mention this play is part musical and features a singing narrator?) made the evening particularly strange.

You Were Never Really Here – This is one of the best movies of the year. Its raw, wounded, dark, terrifying yet beautiful, depressive and deeply mournful. It’s an uncomfortable movie because it takes you to emotional places that most people have never been before. Its traumatized. Its an American tragedy. . . And yet hope. It was a beautiful day today.

Week in Review: April 2nd – April 8th, 2018

Three Sisters – Wang Bing’s beautiful and heartbreaking documentary from 2012 traces a year in the lives of three sisters in an unconnected and undeveloped village in rural Yunnan Province. The three sisters, ages 4 through 10, are left to fend for themselves while their father works in the distant city of Kunming; the mother has abandoned the family. Yang Yang, the eldest, becomes the work horse and pseudo-mother to the younglings, performing all of the rigorous farm and house work in addition to attending grade school. The key sequence is late in the film, when the father takes the younger two children to the city, relieving Yang Yang of her responsibility, but leaving her completely alone as a consequence. It’s an overwhelming portrait of poverty, isolation and resilience. Often relying on a crew of himself, Wang captures it all with a hand-held, low-grade video recorder for a cinéma-vérité style. As a viewer, you almost never forget that Wang is in the scene filming and yet he rarely loses the fly on the wall invisibility that allows life to unravel in its natural rhythms.

British Sounds – Another Godard directed Dziga Vertov Group political film, this one set in Great Britain in the late ‘60’s. It’s divided into roughly 5-10 minute segments each with entirely different visual stratagems. The first and best sequence features one long continuous pan through a Renault automobile assembly line, Marxist commentary included. Another one features a newscaster reading over-the-top, politically incorrect right-wing political commentary. This segment is remarkable in how it resembles actually politically incorrect talking points featured any given day on Fox News. Godard’s satire is now just real life. A less positive sequence features a long take of a naked woman from the waist down, the voice over describing the need for female agency and empowerment in society. This didn’t offend me per se, in fact, it is quite powerful, but I would have been more comfortable with this scene coming from a female director.

Freer Gallery of Art – This took three attempts, but I finally made it through the entirety of the newly renovated permanent collection of the Freer Gallery of Art. Though the building isn’t particularly large, like any good museum, it rewards patience and careful consideration. It features ceramics, sculpture and painting from across the Asian continent paired with some American work for contrast. The Chinese and Japanese Art collections were my favorites, especially the Chinese jade Bi from the Liangzhu culture and the various Japanese wabi-sabi vessels. The former are particularly mysterious because historians are unsure what function they played in society. Sometimes individuals would be buried with them, and others would be passed down within families for generations.

Meshes of the Afternoon – Maya Deren and Alexander Hammid’s short avant-garde debut. This was a re-watch and I was blown away by the cinematography. The turbulent identity loop Deren’s character literally climbs through sits in a continuum, building on the promise of Jean Vigo’s Zero for Conduct and Luis Buñuel’s Un Chien Andalou, anticipating the later work of Jean Cocteau and even Christopher Nolan’s Inception. Thematically, the woman in psychological peril subject matter feels as accomplished as David Lynch’s oeuvre. A reminder that we should all be paying more attention to the avant-garde. Speaking of which, where is the avant garde in film today? Surely Lynch and Malick are too mainstream now. Who else?

Queer Eye – The first episode of this reboot is just ridiculous fun. I find that intimate moments in reality TV are harder for me to buy into than in fictional or documentary film; The staging and editing room manipulations tend to be too obvious. BUT, this Fab Five are so likeable and their feel good message of self-love and empowerment is so important that it was easy to forgive the show’s flaws. I particularly enjoyed the little montages each host gets before their segments. For example, Jonathan Van Ness, the hair stylist, will be twirling his admittedly amazing hair while dancing with a huge smile for multiple quick shots. Totally infectious.

Port of Shadows – Marcel Carné’s moody, noir-ish portrait of a world at the brink of oblivion. It’s 1938, Jean (a sterling Jean Gabin) has deserted the army and hitchhiked to the port city of Le Havre, intending to escape the dark shadow looming over Europe. In the city, Jean gets entangled with the locals and falls for the charming Nelly (Michèle Morgan), giving fate enough time to wrap its tentacles around him. Nearly everything and everyone is great here, most notably Carné’s expression of masculinity through Gabin. Gabin’s Jean is running away from his duty and his country, yet Carné directs only sympathy with this choice. Moreover, throughout the film Jean stands as a moralizing force for the other male characters, literally beating them when they get out of line. This code, a personal hierarchy of masculine values, strikes me as particularly French, a precursor to the type of cool masculinity that defines the later crime noirs of Jean-Pierre Melville.

A Quiet Place – Jim from The Office directing a pretty good horror film! I would give this movie an A for concept and a B / B- for execution. John Krasinski is a competent director and, if A Quiet Place is any indication, an ambitious one. The best scene is at the halfway point when the wife, played by Emily Blunt (Krasinski’s real-life wife), must give birth in silence after stepping on a nail. Also promising is Krasinski’s aptitude for spatial management on a massive farm set. Too much of this film is directed safely, the visual puzzle pieces are a little too big to make it challenging. Worse, I found myself grasping at straws to build a coherent thematic response from its swirl of Biblical and Americana imagery. Perhaps a larger interpretation will congeal over time. In the meantime, I am eager to see what this box office success will afford Krasinski next.

Isle of Dogs

This is basically a defense of Wes Anderson, which is a position I’d never dreamed I would be in 10 years ago.

Wes Anderson, above all else, is an aesthete and his films are extensions of his personal style. I’ve come to terms with his output being more about presentation than what is presented. And in fact, only when we stop protesting what he isn’t and address what he is, can we actually criticize him.

Though there is nothing overly new or rich about the characters, story, or themes in Wes Anderson’s Isle of Dogs, from an animation perspective alone this film is worth seeing. Anderson creatively synthesizes cutting edge stop-motion animation with Japanese woodblock print imagery, kabuki and bunraku theater influences to create images and sequences that are easily some of the best in his œuvre, and some of the best in animation.

Buried in Anderson’s style fixations is his ethos of individualism, personal duty, social civics, and common morals. Again, he’s not treading new thematic or psychological ground, but he is finding new, unique and interesting ways to express himself. That is more than most artists ever achieve. In his commitment to this ethos, and as an auteur with substance, I see much more in common between Anderson and Robert Bresson or Quentin Tarantino, than I do Michael Bay.

Now for the cultural appropriation question, for which this film has drawn much ire. Overall, I found this film’s approach to be well-meaning and indeed respectful of Japanese culture. The lengths to which Anderson goes to carefully emulate Japanese theater, woodblock printing and cinema speaks volumes. I liken this film more to his masterwork The Grand Budapest Hotel than The Darjeeling Limited. The latter film renders the Indian subcontinent as a colorful, exotic backdrop for white man-child angst, while the former is an example of a film that intelligently and creatively engages with a foreign culture. In fact, I would like to see more filmmakers attempt what Anderson is doing here. And finally, as a challenge for any criticisms, I think most of the claims of foul play could (and would) still be argued even if Anderson had made the opposite choices. This begs the question, is what is being criticized actually the problem, or is the problem that people shouldn’t create artistic projects that engage with cultures foreign to the artist. Obviously there is a line for cultural appropriation, but I do not think this film approaches it.

All of this is to say that I found Isle of Dogs to be a charmingly slight, or slightly charming, film and a must-see for animation fans. Oddly, my biggest complaint with it is that there are not nearly enough dogs in it!

The New Yorker

In the Fall of 2012, my late Grandma Lydia and my father came to visit me in college at SMU. My Grandma brought with her several copies of a magazine called The New Yorker. I was vaguely familiar with this magazine, but had never actually held a copy before that point. On one of those afternoons, resting in their hotel room before heading out for the next activity, I eyed one she had left on the couch. Enticed by its colorful cover design, I picked it up, slumped in a chair and began to flip through it; within minutes I knew this was something I needed.

It was the September 10, 2012 Fashion issue. I really only turned the pages, reading little bits here and there, but I knew. In that issue, as in all of them, there were endless descriptions of New York City’s surplus of cultural events, trendy political commentary, personal essays by famous writers, long form journalism, long form culture articles, short fiction, poetry, cartoons and reviews of what at that time seemed like everything. My grandmother, noticing the glint in my eye, urged me to keep that issue. In the days that followed, I read that magazine from cover to cover, a rarity for anyone familiar with it. My thirst unquenched,  I then signed up for the trial subscription. And when that was finished, I became a yearly paying subscriber which has been the case for the last 5 years. In that time, I’ve received the magazine weekly, devouring and struggling to keep up with that relentless pile, often bringing my own stacks of back issues on vacations and holidays.

As of April 9th, 2018, I am no longer a subscriber. Without going into detail as to why, I instead want to use this space to reflect. The magazine was, without a doubt, one of the integral catalysts for my broader intellectual curiosity late in college. I can honestly say I wouldn’t be who I am today without it. Despite any criticisms that have led me to this decision, it is more true to say that my leaving the The New Yorker is a signifier of just how influential it has been. Perhaps I will be a subscriber again one day, and I will still be loosely following it online (within the 10 free articles a month constraint). But for now, a heartfelt goodbye and thank you to The New Yorker.