Week in Review: April 9th – April 15th, 2018

The New Yorker

Gemini – Aaron Katz’s glitzy new mumble-noir. As the title would suggest, this film is about twins, and I would contend that it is about two interrelated sets of twin relationships. The first pair is that of movie star Heather (Zoey Kravitz) and her personal assistant Jill (Lola Kirke). After setting up this pair’s intimate friendship, Heather is ~spoilers~ murdered, shot dead by the same gun that Jill had leant her the night before. As the prime suspect, Jill must evade the LAPD and the stylish, loquacious detective on the case (John Cho), as she scours the city for clues to solve her friend’s murder. The second Gemini relationship is that of Los Angeles and the film noir genre. On this front, Gemini does not fair well in a direct comparison with any auteur-directed, LA-set neo-noir made this century; Mulholland Dr., Brick, Drive, and Inherent Vice pretty much run the gambit and each of those are certainly more, well, let’s say narratively consequential. Which is not to say that this film doesn’t carve out its own space. The film’s strength lies in the writing, all by Katz, which resembles a fusion of delectable noir-isms and twentysomething speak – hashtags, slang, apps, etc.

Jealousy – Philippe Garrel’s 2013 effort La jalousie is his first entry in a recent trilogy on love. Starring his son Louis, the film elliptically picks at a series of frayed relationship’s detailing the role that jealousy plays in motivating relationship, parenting and career decisions. The choice to shoot on film in sumptuous black & white is effective in delineating these character motives and in targeting a particular male obliviousness. I’m unfamiliar with Garrel’s other work so I’m at a loss for context, but this picture felt a lot like watching a Éric Rohmer film from the 1960’s only without the humor or playfulness. I prefer the Rohmer.

Isle of Dogs

The Caucasian Chalk Circle – Bertolt Brecht’s modernist epic play within a play was entirely new to me. Beginning in a post-WWII Soviet Union town, a group of townspeople debate how to rebuild their economy with a local administrator. Reaching an impasse, the group suggests they put on a play that they’ve been working on to clarify their current concerns. This new play, set in medieval times, tells the tale of a royal baby, abandoned by its mother during a bloody regime change. The baby is found by a young woman named Grusha, who listens to her conscience and risks her life to rescue the child. The majority of the plot follows Grusha on the run, struggling to find conditions suitable to raise the child, culminating in a trial to determine the child’s proper home. Despite the fairy tale ending, I think the play is about how in times of great upheaval society’s only way to deal with the moral and ethical dilemmas of the present is to seek refuge in a past that tends to be inadequate, rendered obsolete by the very forces causing the upheaval. That things work out here for the people who do the right thing is tongue-in-cheek, a fantasy that Brecht forces the audience to retreat out of into a reality that inevitably proves harsher. This production all-around was scrappy and inventive, spearheaded by three terrific performances. The electric guitar led, synth-backed folk song sequences (did I mention this play is part musical and features a singing narrator?) made the evening particularly strange.

You Were Never Really Here – This is one of the best movies of the year. Its raw, wounded, dark, terrifying yet beautiful, depressive and deeply mournful. It’s an uncomfortable movie because it takes you to emotional places that most people have never been before. Its traumatized. Its an American tragedy. . . And yet hope. It was a beautiful day today.

The New Yorker

In the Fall of 2012, my late Grandma Lydia and my father came to visit me in college at SMU. My Grandma brought with her several copies of a magazine called The New Yorker. I was vaguely familiar with this magazine, but had never actually held a copy before that point. On one of those afternoons, resting in their hotel room before heading out for the next activity, I eyed one she had left on the couch. Enticed by its colorful cover design, I picked it up, slumped in a chair and began to flip through it; within minutes I knew this was something I needed.

It was the September 10, 2012 Fashion issue. I really only turned the pages, reading little bits here and there, but I knew. In that issue, as in all of them, there were endless descriptions of New York City’s surplus of cultural events, trendy political commentary, personal essays by famous writers, long form journalism, long form culture articles, short fiction, poetry, cartoons and reviews of what at that time seemed like everything. My grandmother, noticing the glint in my eye, urged me to keep that issue. In the days that followed, I read that magazine from cover to cover, a rarity for anyone familiar with it. My thirst unquenched,  I then signed up for the trial subscription. And when that was finished, I became a yearly paying subscriber which has been the case for the last 5 years. In that time, I’ve received the magazine weekly, devouring and struggling to keep up with that relentless pile, often bringing my own stacks of back issues on vacations and holidays.

As of April 9th, 2018, I am no longer a subscriber. Without going into detail as to why, I instead want to use this space to reflect. The magazine was, without a doubt, one of the integral catalysts for my broader intellectual curiosity late in college. I can honestly say I wouldn’t be who I am today without it. Despite any criticisms that have led me to this decision, it is more true to say that my leaving the The New Yorker is a signifier of just how influential it has been. Perhaps I will be a subscriber again one day, and I will still be loosely following it online (within the 10 free articles a month constraint). But for now, a heartfelt goodbye and thank you to The New Yorker.